08182017Fri
Last updateFri, 18 Aug 2017 1pm

i

Safety Relief Valve FAQs

Safety Relief Valve FAQs

Companies that repair, test, maintain or...

An Update on U.S. Valve-Related Standards

An Update on U.S. Valve-Related Standards

It takes much time and effort by many pe...

Diagnostics for Commissioning and Startup

Diagnostics for Commissioning and Startup

Many facilities have found value in perf...

Subscribe SUM17

FREE SUBSCRIPTION*

•  Print magazine
•  Digital magazine
•  VALVE eNews
Read the latest issue

*to qualified valve professionals in the U.S./Canada

The Weekly Report

New Products

  • ja-news-2
  • ja-news-3

Industry Headlines

Advertisement
i

Web Only

Safety Relief Valve FAQs

Safety Relief Valve FAQs

Monday, 14 August 2017  |  Lyndon Garrick

Companies that repair, test, maintain or supply valves routinely receive inquiries from end users about safety-relief valves. Here are a few questions...

Readmore

Loading...

Industry Headlines

Forum Energy Technologies Acquires Multilift

1 DAY AGO

Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. has acquired the stock of Multilift from Pelican Energy Partners, a Houston-based oilfield services focused private equity fund, and management. Based in Houston, Multilift manufactures the patented SandGuard and the Cyclone completion tools; products that extend the ...

Readmore

ValvTechnologies Names Teele Director of Global Quality Management

3 DAYS AGO

ValvTechnologies, Inc. has appointed Michael Teele director of global quality management. Based in Houston, Teele will be responsible for setting and maintaining global quality standards, systems and processes, as well as serving as a leadership champion of continuous improvement. With a deep technic...

Readmore

Executive Order to Speed Up Infrastructure Project Approval

1 DAY AGO

President Trump signed an executive order intended to roll back “rules regarding environmental reviews and restrictions on government-funded building projects in flood-prone areas as part of his proposal to spend $1 trillion to fix aging U.S. infrastructure,” Reuters reports .

“Trump's...

Readmore

DuPont and Dow Chemical Set Closing Date for Merger

2 DAYS AGO

DuPont and The Dow Chemical Company announced that all required regulatory approvals and clearances have been received, that all conditions to closing of their merger of equals have been satisfied, and that their merger of equals will close after the market closes on August 31, 2017.

“The compa...

Readmore

U.S. Factory Output Declined in July

7 HOURS AGO

Manufacturing output edged down 0.1% in July. The index for durables decreased 0.5%. Among durable manufacturing industries, with the indexes for primary metals and for furniture and related products each dropped more than 1%. The index for other manufacturing (publishing and logging) moved down 0.4%....

Readmore

Empire State Manufacturing Index Highest in Nearly Three Years

2 DAYS AGO

Business activity grew strongly in New York State, according to firms responding to the August 2017 Empire State Manufacturing Survey. The headline general business conditions index climbed fifteen points to 25.2, its highest level since September 2014. The new orders index rose seven points to 20.6 a...

Readmore

Addressing Welding Procedures Not Covered by ASME Section IX

materials_q_and_a_graphicQ: My customer has rejected my welding procedure specification (WPS) and has asked me to address items that are not required by ASME Section IX. Is this reasonable?

A: Yes, this is a reasonable request. In many cases, it is a good idea to address items not covered by Section IX1.

Many people view any given ASME code section as a handbook, and assume that if they follow everything in that code section, they have met all necessary requirements. However, each ASME code section has verbiage in the foreword warning the user that merely following the rules in that particular section will not ensure an adequate design. Such wording is phrased in ways like: “The user of the Code should refer to other pertinent codes, standards, laws, regulations or other relevant documents,” and “it is not intended that this Section be used as a design handbook; rather, engineering judgment must be employed in the selection of those sets of Code rules suitable to any specific service or need.”

For example, Section IX does not impose enough controls to ensure reliable weld joints because it does not address the proper choice of filler materials. Section IX would allow welding nickel alloys or copper alloys together using carbon steel filler, provided the qualification specimen passed the appropriate mechanical tests. Many variables are not required to be addressed in a Section IX WPS. But in many of these cases, a WPS that does not address those variables may not produce consistently reliable weld joints or provide adequate guidance to the welder, both of which should be the primary purpose of the WPS.

The following are examples of factors Section IX does not require, but that should be considered for inclusion in a WPS:

1. There are supplementary essential variables not required to be addressed for a WPS to be used on materials that are not impact-tested. One such essential variable is heat input, which is calculated based on current, voltage and travel speed. If heat input does not need to be addressed, Section IX does not require including voltage or travel speed values. Some of the software packages for creating WPS documents will even omit this information automatically. On the other hand, if no voltage or travel speed values are specified, it is possible to follow the WPS and still produce unacceptable welds. Therefore, even though not required by Section IX, it is beneficial to include reasonable voltage and travel speed values on the WPS—even for materials that are not impact-tested.

2. For a WPS that involves carbon and alloy steels postweld heat-treated (PWHT) below the lower transformation temperature (LTT), Section IX only requires the WPS to indicate the PWHT must be below the LTT.

Most WPSs for non-impact-tested carbon steels and alloy steels will actually state a PWHT temperature, but many omit the tolerance on this temperature and any soak time requirements.

To ensure that proper strength, ductility and hardness requirements are met, a PWHT temperature range should be stated on the WPS. That temperature range should be based upon the PWHT temperature used on the qualification coupon, taking into consideration the effects of higher and lower temperature on the strength, ductility, hardness and toughness of the material. In addition, as a function of base metal thickness, guidance should be provided regarding the soak time, as well as providing absolute minimum and maximum allowable soak times. Again, strength, ductility, hardness and toughness of the material should be taken into account.

3. Section IX does not prohibit combining procedures that have been qualified in different ways, such as procedures qualified with and without PWHT, or procedures qualified with and without controls required for impact-tested materials. In fact, creating one WPS that covers non-impact-tested material (such as WCC) and impact-tested material (such as LCC), with and without PWHT is both possible and allowed. These procedures are handy when it is necessary to get a customer review. However, the combined procedures tend to be difficult for welders to follow because they usually contain a number of notes and tables, and for any given job it can be hard to determine what information actually applies.

Although the combined approach is allowed, and although the combined document might be convenient from a creation and maintenance standpoint, it is actually better to create four separate WPS documents (non-impact without PWHT, non-impact with PWHT, impact without PWHT and impact with PWHT), because each WPS will then convey much more clearly the specific requirements for the pertinent situation.

In summary, although Section IX imposes an abundance of rules for qualifying and writing WPSs, there are many instances where additional controls and information need to be conveyed to ensure results that meet the intended requirements of the weld. Therefore, if your customer makes a comment on your welding procedure, view it as a possible learning experience. In the end, your WPSs will be better for it.

Reference:

ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section IX, “Qualification Standard for Welding and Brazing Procedures, Welders, Brazers, and Welding and Brazing Operators,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, USA.


Don Bush is a principal materials engineer at Emerson Process Management-Fisher Valve Division (www.emersonprocess.com). Reach him at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

  • Latest Post

  • Popular

  • Links

  • Events

Advertisement

Looking for a career in the Valve Industry?

ValveCareers Horiz

To learn more, watch the videos below or visit ValveCareers.com a special initiative of the Valve Manufacturers Association