Beyond Valves

Advances in Mechanical Seals

Manufacturers of mechanical seals today are constantly working to engineer longer-lasting, safer, easier-to-use and lower-emission seals for the benefit of seal users, the products they produce and the environment. Technology can be an enabling key to mechanical seal reliability, but it is not the only key. Without knowing the true process conditions, understanding interrelated effects of the larger system, and operating the system properly, good technology applied badly may not ultimately improve reliability.

Successful manufacturers of mechanical seals today must apply critical investigative skills into selecting the right technology for each application, and then instill a practical, working knowledge of proper operating and maintenance techniques essential for success. A close relationship between the seal supplier and plant personnel increases the likelihood of achieving high-reliability objectives.

Increasing the Lifecycle

To understand what the manufacturers are doing to increase the life cycle of seals, look directly at the primary mechanism in a mechanical seal: the small separation between parallel-sliding stationary and rotating seal faces. Striking the proper balance of loads, heat generation, surface finish and parallelism will define the amount of leakage that passes through and rubbing wear that limits life. Every component of a mechanical seal—from the stationary gland to the rotating sleeve—must be designed to contribute positively toward maintaining this micro-fine parallel interface.

Heat generation caused by rubbing friction at the seal interface can lead to shorter seal life if the mechanical seal is not designed to tolerate such conditions. For example, seals that are designed for liquid services count on the fluid to provide cooling and lubrication. If this fluid is no longer available—such as if a valve is unexpectedly closed—no lubrication plus no cooling equal high heat generation and rapid seal face wear. There are many other ways to cause dry running of seals and a special case involves the fluid itself vaporizing on or near the seal faces. Light hydrocarbons and hot water will boil on seal faces when the vapor pressure is breached by the temperature or absolute pressure.

If the seal faces run without contacting, heat from friction can be eliminated. However, non-contacting seal faces allow leakage, and depending on the fluid type, this can be a concern for environmental or safety reasons. If the fluid type is a gas, having non-contacting seal faces is a good way to eliminate frictional heat and wear, when gas leakage is acceptable. Again, the seal manufacturer’s goal is to manage the parallel-sliding interface appropriately for the service conditions. The challenge is to engineer a mechanical seal that performs reliably under constantly changing and often unknown conditions, where mere micro-inches (micrometers) define the difference between excessive emissions or heat generation problems.

New Technologies

One of the most important areas on which technology is being applied today is in optimizing the relationship between the two seal faces by introducing some very fine structures or patterns on the faces in order to create a special environment in the parallel-sliding interface.

Surface features on the seal face, or face topography, create supportive forces to counteract the forces trying to crush the faces closed. These engineered patterns and grooves create a pressure profile that ranges from fully neutralizing all the closing loads, resulting in complete seal face separation, or a pressure profile that reduces most of the closing loads, resulting in light seal face contact. Seals destined for dry gas service use a topography that develops full-face separation, and seals designed for wet or marginally wet service use a topography that acts to reduce contact loads.

Some topographies for gas media have a series of sharp-edged grooves that draw gas into a narrowing area. This narrowing causes the internal pressure to increase to a higher level than outside the seal face. The net result is the higher interface pressure overcomes the pressures that work to close the seal faces, and the seal faces separate and stay open with a very thin film of gas. At the point of seal face separation, the interface pressure decreases due to lower effectiveness over the separation, and force equilibrium of the seal faces is satisfied at a specific separation. Whole product lines exist for dry gas applications that use seal face topographies to generate lift and cause seal face separation.

Another pattern is a smooth wave design that involves a sinusoidal series of peaks and valleys that allows the processing fluid to enter and then exit from the same direction it entered. When the fluid is squeezed back out of the wave valley at the wave peak, the pressure increases in a similar fashion to the topography for gas seals. Waves are especially useful in providing enough interface pressure to relieve a measured portion of the closing loads so that the net result is face contact at a reduced rate.

In addition to the grooved and wavy seal faces, there are many varieties of micro-surface features that have been introduced to optimize reliability and performance for particular problems.

In various process industries and especially by fluid type, zero emissions to the environment are allowed. Many volatile, toxic and hazardous fluids are regulated with penalties against emitters or the fluid may pose an inherent safety risk. In these situations and others, dual seals are typically used to prevent any process leakage. As the name implies, two sets of mechanical seals are combined and filled with a liquid or gas that provides a barrier against process leakage. The seal faces then operate on this barrier liquid instead of the process fluid, which alone or with seal face features can contribute to further reliability gains. Dual gas seals are good examples of applied seal face technology that address dry running, zero emissions, process contamination and energy consumption issues all at the same time.


Seal face surface technologies have improved reliability and performance in numerous services and applications such as:

  • Low-vapor pressure/light-hydrocarbon seals
  • Hot-water seals
  • Gas seals
  • Containment seals
  • High-speed/high-pressure seals
  • Steam turbine seals
  • Multiphase-pump seals
  • Mixer seals
  • Gearbox seals

 

Forming Alliances

Another major trend in the mechanical seals industry is a growing awareness of how the larger system upstream and downstream of the seal operates and what role seals play. The better understanding we have collectively of the larger system, the better we can improve the reliability of the seal. Factoring in the influence of flush plans and auxiliary seal support devices is crucial to building reliability.

Plant managers and mechanics are paying closer attention to mean time between failure (MTBF) rates because of the impact any rotating equipment outage can have on plant operations. Seal manufacturers are also paying attention to MTBF as a value-added partner and service provider. If seals are primarily only along for the ride, having a stake in the system is essential to increasing specific seal MTBF.

To help give seals the best opportunity for long life, seals must be well cared for, so manufacturers are providing training to all levels of plant employees—not just the sales engineers who make sales calls, but rotating equipment specialists who know how to work with rotating equipment, identify root causes and provide actionable solutions. In the case of a true alliance partnership, an onsite application engineer works with plant personnel on a daily basis to troubleshoot equipment problems, select the right seal types, monitor MTBF performance and manage inventory. Close interaction between seal manufacturers and process plants feeds product improvement ideas that in turn can further extend seal performance.

Clearly these working relationships between seal supplier and plant personnel are key for engineering maximum plant uptime, especially now as the industrial plant talent pool continues to contract. Otherwise, throwing technology at a problem may not achieve the intended results.

Joseph C. Parker is an engineer and product marketing manager for Flowserve—Flow Solutions Division. Reach him at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..