08192019Mon
Last updateMon, 19 Aug 2019 4pm

Can Pressure Regulators Replace Control Valves in Bioprocessing?

The production of biopharmaceuticals is an extremely delicate bioprocess and any change to that process that occurs too rapidly can potentially destroy a batch worth millions of dollars. Therefore, it is critical that any necessary adjustments to the process be performed under precise pressures and flow rates. The introduction of high-purity gases for a variety of reasons would be one such adjustment. Traditionally, these gases have been added using a control valve. However, control valves require air or electric power to operate, either internal or external sensing of the system being controlled and, in many cases, a complex distributed control system to adjust the control valve’s positioner based on system response.

Is there a simpler solution? What are the differences between a control valve and a pressure regulator? What are processes or applications where a pressure regulator could be used instead of a control valve? And, finally, what are the advantages of doing this? Let’s explore this further.

HOW PHARMACEUTICALS ARE MANUFACTURED

Traditionally, pharmaceuticals used to treat various ailments were low-molecular-weight molecules that were relatively easy to synthesize from known compounds. For example, ibuprofen (Figure 1), an over-the-counter-pain medicine used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, was originally produced using the Boots’ synthesis method, patented by the original manufacturer, to produce the drug from the compound 2-methylpropylbenzene, which can be made from compounds separated from crude oil.

Figure 1Figure 1. Simple structure of ibuprofen

Advances in science and medicine have led to alternatives to these traditionally made pharmaceuticals through bioprocessing. Bioprocessing uses organisms or their components to carry out enzymatic reactions or to manufacture products. This is how biopharmaceuticals are made. Biopharmaceuticals are high-molecular-weight molecules manufactured in, extracted from, or semi-synthesized from biological sources such as mammalian cells. Etanercept (Figure 2), sold under the trade name Enbrel, also used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, is one such biopharmaceutical: It is produced in a bioreactor rather than through synthesis.

Figure 2Figure 2. Complex structure of etanercept

EQUIPMENT

Bioprocessing typically requires the following components: an energy source (such as glucose), nitrogen, buffers (to control pH, for example), vitamins, growth factors and inorganic salts to create an environment for living cells to grow and thrive. Bioprocessing environments require precise control of factors such as temperature, pH, oxygen, nutrients and contamination. Controlled environments such as this can start out as simple shake or spinner flasks, until a suitable concentration is grown and then the cells are transferred to a bioreactor. Cells are then put through a process in the controlled environment that forces them to produce the desired proteins. These proteins are what the downstream process harvests as our biopharmaceutical.

There are many types of bioreactors including bubble column reactors, airlift bioreactors and filtration-cell recycling bioreactors. Stirred tank bioreactors are the most common. Typically, these bioreactors already have a significant number of ancillary systems and equipment. Adding the necessary support equipment for a control valve may be undesirable for financial reasons and/or to prevent the need for additional penetrations into the clean environment for air lines and sensors.

UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCES

Bioreactors use high-purity gases for many purposes. Can a regulator be used instead to control flow of these gases? Understanding the differences between a control valve and regulator is crucial to answering this question. From an operational standpoint, the main difference between a control valve and a regulator is that a control valve requires system sensing, external electric or air power, and perhaps a complex control system, while a regulator is driven by and responds directly to system pressure without the need for any sensor or external power.

For a control valve, first a process control variable (such as temperature, pressure, flow, level, etc.) is measured by a sensor or transmitter and then sent to a programmable logic controller (PLC). The PLC is responsible for interpreting how the valve should respond to a deviation from the predetermined set-point value of the control variable. The PLC sends a signal to the valve actuator to close or open the valve in order to return to the set point.

Figure 3Figure 3. Cutaway of a pressure regulator

In a regulator (Figure 3), the pressure of the controlled process fluid exerts a force against a diaphragm-spring arrangement. Using the equation for pressure, which is p = F/A, we can rearrange and show that the force from the spring on the diaphragm is equal to system pressure times the area of diaphragm. Using Hooke’s Law we then know the force of a spring is equal to -kx, where k is a constant factor characteristic of the spring and x is the amount the spring is stretched or expanded. Therefore, it creates a force balance between system pressure and spring force. This causes the flow area of the regulator to change, allowing more or less process fluid to flow.

formula

Pressure regulating valves manipulate flow to control pressure. Because of the force balance mentioned above, regulators respond instantly to pressure changes and therefore have a faster response than control valves. Good applications for using a pressure regulating valve include gas overlay of a cell culture or protein mixture, moving fluids into or out of a process, sparging (bubbling gas up through) a process, lyophilization (freeze drying) and, on newer systems, inflation of single-use disposable (SUD) bags.

CHOOSING THE RIGHT SOLUTION

Factors that can affect a pressure regulator’s sensitivity are diaphragm area, diaphragm material, orifice size and spring rate. Flow (Cv) through a valve can be affected by orifice size, plug shape and material, and stroke.

Innovative manufacturers have optimized these factors for use on high-purity gas systems. Use of pressure regulators instead of control valves provides the following advantages:

  • Compact Size. This not only makes them more affordable, but it decreases the install volume. Install volume can be particularly important on compact skids or smaller bioreactors.
  • Low-Flow Control. By optimizing the plug geometry and size relative to the orifice of the valve, very precise low flow rates can be obtained.
  • No External Connections. Eliminates additional leak points, makes the product more compact, eliminates additional ancillary systems and penetrations into clean rooms where systems are located.
  • Low-Pressure Control. The relatively large diaphragm provides a high level of sensitivity in a small unit, allowing for control of very low pressure.
  • Lower Cost. Not only does the simplicity of a pressure regulator mean lower cost, but also using a regulator eliminates the need for a control system of any kind.

Manufacturers are helping pharmaceutical companies develop smart, simple solutions that also help reduce costs.


This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. is the engineering manager at Richards Industries and product engineer at the Steriflow Division (www.richardsind.com).  

Subscribe SUM19

FREE SUBSCRIPTION*

• Print magazine
Digital magazine
• VALVE eNews
Read the latest issue

*to qualified valve professionals in the U.S./Canada

Looking for a career in the Valve Industry?

ValveCareers Horiz

To learn more, visit the Valve Careers YouTube channel to watch the videos below or visit ValveCareers.com a special initiative of the Valve Manufacturers Association

  • Latest Post

  • Popular

  • Links

  • Events

New Products