Published December 29, 2013
The concepts used in long-term cost of ownership (LTCO) go back as far as the 1700s.
By Arun Dhingra
While capital procurement budgets cannot ignore initial purchase price, LTCO can help purchasers look further down the road to see the long-term effects that purchasing one valve option or using one valve supplier will have over another. The cost differences can be dramatic. Here are eight factors that affect LTCO:
1. Choosing the right valve
Maybe this is an obvious point, but there are too many tales of valves misapplied in one way or another. In those cases, the cost impact can be dramatic. Specifying the right valve is simply a function of understanding the process parameters and then applying knowledge of valve’s characteristics. It only makes sense to work with suppliers that have similar application experience. These suppliers also should have expert tools such as valve sizing and selection software to take the uncertainty out of the selection process.
Once the right valve is chosen, there remains a wide range of options that go with that selection. Those choices and their effects are:
3. Adopt the right technologies
The purchase price of critical process control and automated on/off valves amounts to only a fraction of their total LTCO. Often, paying a little more for equipment with advanced technologies will significantly reduce the LTCO. Life-cycle cost reductions come about in these ways:
The actual savings of using intelligent technologies varies by application; however, it is not unusual for plants that might pay 20% more for valves equipped with intelligent technologies to realize a life-cycle cost savings of 30%.
4. Ensure the quality of the valves purchased
5. Use a single resource for valve package purchases
Many companies already limit valve purchasing to a small number of vendors. But are these vendors also providing fully integrated package solutions? Certainly, a single source of supply can be convenient and save costs. Buying valve packages using components from a single valve manufacturer can also result in significant savings in LTCO. Why is this? Usually parts and materials have been manufactured to the same stringent quality standards using the same best practices and the latest technologies. This mitigates risk and cuts down significantly on initial investment, which is one of the keys to minimizing LTCO and maximizing return on investment.
6. Maintain valves for best service
Reducing the cost of valve ownership doesn’t begin and end with hardware. It is also important to understand specific application demands and what it takes to minimize, predict, and—better yet—prevent downtime.
It’s important to create routines for checking the performance of specific valves based on known life cycles and to keep track of data in historical databases to enable the analysis of trends and performance behaviors. Much of this can be automated.
Valve networking solutions allow for systematic, remote monitoring of on/off valves, while digital valve controllers enable advanced diagnostics and predictive maintenance for control valves. Pre-shutdown valve audits can identify where problems are likely to occur and what contingencies are required to address them. These strategies also help extend maintenance intervals. The key is to use all of the tools available to pinpoint potential problems before they happen.
7. Optimize spare parts inventories
Suppliers can help in performing a critical analysis of valve inventories. Based on equipment ratings, they can provide input to create an inventory strategy aimed at reducing redundant or unnecessary inventories. This ensures that the most critical components are readily available when needed. Critical assets (new or refurbished replacement valve assemblies) should be made ready so damaged or failed valves can be replaced quickly, thereby reducing downtime.
8. The right partner is the key
The right valve partner can help companies make choices that optimize process performance and continuously drive down costs. Shutdown planning reduces costs and improves safety. Recently, one of our customers decided to increase the intervals between shut down for maintenance from four to five years to improve productive uptime and reduce shutdown labor costs.
Knowing this made it possible to focus on automated on/off valves and ESD valves in particular. The scope of maintenance of the on/off valves was determined by a combination of factors, including SIL (safety integrity level) classification and operations experience.
A predictive maintenance program pays for itself many times over. Many valves are taken off-line and repaired because of an inaccurate understanding of their true condition. Predictive maintenance with a competent field service engineer can result in substantial savings by eliminating unnecessary assembly and disassembly work and reducing man-hours required during shutdown. Administrative costs required for planning and purchasing can be reduced because of the smaller numbers of valves identified for extensive service.
The cost of the predictive maintenance contract was paid for many times over by reducing the number of valves taken out during the process and disassembled. The mean time between repairs was extended for monitored valves, and the user saw additional savings by reducing the spare parts stock based on competent field service engineers’ recommendations. Also, this shop also reduced the administrative time normally spent buying spare parts. These savings were allocated to other important maintenance activities at the plant.
To truly understand the total cost of ownership of a valve, one must look beyond the obvious numbers on the initial price tag to take a long-range look at what a valve can really do to the company’s bottom line. Using the steps outlined in this LTCO approach can have benefits that far outweigh that initial savings. |
Arun Dhingra is national sales manager for Velan Valves, India. You may contact him at arun.dhingra@velan.com.
How tariffs, AI and geopolitical risk are fueling a resurgence in areas of manufacturing.
March 18, 2026
David Escobar
March 16, 2026
The ruling doesn’t apply to all tariffs, only some of the reciprocal tariffs that were imposed, and those levied on Mexico, Canada and China regarding the flow of fentanyl into the U.S.
February 20, 2026